one piece usb speaker for mac less then $20

One Piece Usb Speaker Less Then $20 Software Players Sound

Digital data is digital data it either gets there or it doesnt, and the 1s and 0s dont really care how comfortable the ride is as long as they make it to the other end in one piece.

Even though they use the same connector, Thunderbolt 3 and USB-C are actually two different standards; a USB-C cable may sell for less, but it cant do the same job.

This is why shorter cables are generally a bit more reasonably priced Apple sells a 0.8-meter Thunderbolt 3 cable with the exact same specs as its 129 Pro cable, although its the more traditional white rubber look rather than the nicer black braiding, which also likely makes up for part of the price difference as well.

However, as a a number of Reddit users are pointing out, if youre doing the kind of work and have the kind of equipment where this level of Thunderbolt connectivity will make an actual difference, 129 is actually a drop in the bucket.

After much research, I realized that I had two options: (1) external dac - stereo ampreceiver - bookshelf speakers or (2) optical line out from my Macbook - AV receiver - bookshelf speakers.

BTW, if Im wrong about anything, please let me know.

Im a fledging audiophile who only recently started learning about all this.) Initially, I intended to go with the first route because many people have stated that the sound quality of an external dac and stereo amp combo would be far better than the sound quality of the internal dac inside of a similarly priced AV receiver.

I bought it because I thought that the internal dac on a 1100 receiver, which I bought for 430, would be of same (if not better) sound quality than that of an external dac priced at 400.

And of course, thats not even considering the fact that Id have to buy a stereo ampreceiver (200) on top of the external dac in order to complete my setup if I went with the second route.

All the compromises which might make the RX-A1000 a good hometheater receiver are likely to make it a less than suitable choice for a music system.

Just look at the list of features it has which will never be used and you tell me.

Do you, or anyone else, have any recommendations for an external dac and stereo amp totaling around 400-500 that you guys feel would have better sound quality than my current yamaha receiver.

One of my partners is a hi-fi retailer and Ive done network installs around some of the Yamaha Aventage series receivers.

I like them a lot, but I dont think Id want one as my DAC in a 2-channel system.

Thats not to say that they sound bad and its certainly a fantastic starting point (I started with a garbage 80 DAC), but I think a dedicated DAC thats been designed for 2-channel listening may sound better.

All this being said, you did get a fantastic peace of equipment for 430.

We may not be as enthusiastic about it as you, because the assumption that its DAC is as good as a dedicated one, or that its implemented well, is truly an unknown.

So dont try and figure it out based on fractional cost amounts.

You need a baseline setup before you can judge any future changes; now you have a promising one.

Use a suitable, one-piece cable, not an adapter coming out of the Mac into a regular TosLink cable.

Some other players such as Decibel or Pure Music can directly play FLAC files, akin to Apple Lossless.

One Piece Usb Speaker Less Then $20 Software Players Sound

And FLAC files can be freely converted to say, Apple Lossless with XLD or xACT.) Many people say that these software players sound better than iTunes.

There are places online that purport CD quality aka Redbook aka regular lossless files to be high resolution.

They are not. 16-bit, 44kHz lossless files are certainly better than mp3 or AAC, but they aint hires.

Id really like a true stereo setup and Ive been pleased with my Aventage, which is still going strong.

Just curious if Ill be blown away by a more transparent soundstage or some other aspect Ive been missing out on.

One Piece Usb Speaker For Mac Less Then $20